Sex Sells and Sensationalism

February 29, 2008


It is a well known fact that sex sells.  I posted earlier today about Lindsay Lohan and other celebrities in regards to Playboy Magazine without putting much thought into how many hits I would get.  While my hits aren’t through the roof, I would say that 90-95% of the traffic I have got in the past 7-8 hours has been from searches dealing with “lindsay lohan playboy pictures”.  As a side note, I once got a hit from someone searching for “two girls one cup full video” which gave them the post I did on YouTube and 15 Minutes of Fame.  I wonder if they were disappointed.

I don’t know if I have said the before but I am doing this blog for a class on Sociology and Cyberspace.  Hopefully I will continue it after the class is done as I enjoy doing it.  In class on Wednesday we were talking about ways of increasing “hits” to our sites as there is a 5% bonus to the top 5 blogs in terms of hits.  This would be a nice bonus but I’m not trying to actively seek such traffic by writing on top 10 lists, sex, celebrities or current events.  I find it more enjoyable and a bigger a challenge to write on things that are interest to me.  

This isn’t to say that I am attacking people who do these things.  In fact, more power to them for knowing what people want and being able to write on it.  Instead I find that I like to write on topics that I enjoy and they quite often aren’t the most popular things.  The writing of this blog is enjoyable and challenging.  I have written two other blogs and my style on those blogs are quite different.  To be blunt they consist[ed] of offensive writing often laced with profanities.  With this blog I am trying not to swear as much.

Sensationalism sells and I think this idea can be transferred over to some blogs.  I don’t watch a lot of tv news anymore and don’t read the newspaper as much as I should.  The last few times I’ve watched it I can’t tell if it is news or Entertainment Tonight or a bastardization of both. 


Lindsay Lohan, Playboy Magazine and Other Celebrities

February 29, 2008


According to a New York Post gossip columnist (which we all know is a reliable source for information) Playboy has offered Lindsay Lohan to pose for its magazine.  Apparently she appeared in some magazine doing a famous Marilyn Monroe piece where she posed nude.  Obviously I’m not going to post these pictures or links to them but if you are so inclined to find them a simple Google search will probably show them up.

Once again this may only be a rumor.  I remember when they offered Britney Spears quite a bit of cash and she refused to do it.  Now it seems like every few days there are posts and pictures on celebrity blogs (such as The Superficial and What Would Tyler Durden Do) of her and Lindsay Lohan that involve them wearing minimal, if any clothing.  Some of these posts are more explicit then what would appear if they did agree to pose for Playboy.  However since they are Hollywood celebrities they will probably not agree to do the magazine even though more explicit photos exist of them.  Why?  Most likely they will say because of “integrity” reasons but I think it’s more likely that they are Hollywood numb skulls.  I mean, Lindsay Lohan is on her way to being washed up if she isn’t already.  Want proof?  Watch I Know Who Killed Me.  I’ve seen better acting done in Junior High drama classes.  Who am I kidding, I didn’t even watch the entire movie. 

In my opinion it is someone’s choice to do what they want with their body if they are an adult.  However, it seems like washed up celebrities such as Tiffany and Debbie Gibson agree to do Playboy only when they are trying to revive their career.  Earlier on they refuse to do such things but when they need the career boost they do it.  It seems like everytime they agree to do these shoots they say it’s because Playboy agrees to do shoots that are classy and artful.    Alright, fair enough.  But why didn’t they agree to do them earlier on when they were offered and only decide to pose when their careers are at the same spot Corey Haim’s is? 

Eddie Bravo and Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu

February 28, 2008


The past few weeks I’ve been unable to work out or practice kickboxing and brazilian jiu jitsu (bjj) due to a fun thing I ended up getting.  A few weeks ago I was “rolling” (or sparring bjj) and ended up getting a knee to the face.  A few days later I had a welt under my eye and thought it was a black eye.  No big deal.  A few days later the mark got bigger and closer to my eye and looked different from a black eye so I went to the doctor.  Ends up that I caught a staph infection near my eye.  It surprised me because I’ve heard horror stories about how they are painful but mine wasn’t.  Anyways because of that I stayed away from the gym and working out because I didn’t want to take a chance in being the guy that gives it to everyone else.

So I’ve been on some anti-biotics and the doctor told me to not work out while on them because of the side effects they can cause.  I hate sitting around at home and not being able to workout when I’m frustrated or bored.  So the past few days I’ve decided to watch and read some of the Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu instructionals I have.

Eddie Bravo is one of the guys who’s material I’ve recently been watching.  To quote Wikipedia, he is known for ” his win as a brown belt against Royler Gracie by triangle choke in the Abu Dhabi Submission Wrestling championships the year 2003, and his unique style of no-gi Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu”.  As well he is the pot head buddy of comedian Joe Rogan.  While I don’t have a problem with his pro-marijuana stance, it sometimes gets annoying when you are reading one of his books or watching one of his instructionals and he spends a decent portion of time talking about it.  It just seems out of place. 

What really impresses me about Eddie Bravo’s bjj style is how fluid he is and his crazy flexibility.  Here’s part of an instructional from a magazine featuring him that demonstrates his ingenuity and flexibility in regards to bjj:

It hurts me just to watch this.  I guess I better start stretching.  I hope he comes out with a stretching instructional.

Guitar Hero and an Ironic Anecdote

February 28, 2008


Before I even played it I mocked Guitar Hero.  I thought it was a lot like Dance Dance Revolution which I despise.  I’ve played guitar/bass for around ten years and although I’m not great at it, I can play both instruments well enough to jam with friends.   So I’m not Yngwie Malmsteen or Jaco Pastorius.  Once I actually played it a bit, I changed my mind.  It actually is quite a fun game (especially with a few friends and some alcohol involved).   

A few of my friends who’ve played the game ask me if it is as easy to play guitar as it is in Guitar Hero.  I find it kind of an odd question because they are two seperate things.  There is a big difference between touching 5 buttons and pressing on a knob up and down in time to a song than playing a 6 stringed instrument that may have 21 or more frets.  Not to mention on a real guitar there are many things you can do on it that you can’t in Guitar Hero (sweep picking, harmonics, pinch harmonics, tapping, tap harmonics, etc…)  I don’t know if you can even do hammer ons and pull offs on Guitar Hero.  At the same time, I’ll admit I suck at Guitar Hero.  It just seems odd to me at times that some complex song, complete with guitar solos (such as Metallica’s “One”) is broken down to pressing 5 buttons.

Today I was at a music shop killing some time and saw a guitar book for sale that made me smile.  It was songs from “Guitar Hero“.  Maybe it’s just me but I found it kind of ironic. 

Matt Good, Drunken Jackasses and “Freebird”

February 27, 2008


In November I had the opportunity to work at and see Matt Good perform an acoustic concert in Medicine Hat.  As my friend is a co-owner of a live audio company, I also had the opportunity to see him do his soundcheck in exchange for helping him load out some gear after the show.  It was a great experience to see Matt perform “Born Losers” at soundcheck with only ten people being in the theatre.  It was very intimate.

The actual concert was great as well.  Except of course, there were drunken jackasses yelling out during the show.  This venue seats around 400-500 people and 3 people were booted out during the concert.  A friend of mine saw Matt Good perform at the Jack Singer in Calgary which is much larger and no one was kicked out.  During the show in Medicine Hat one person kept screaming out random remarks or comments between songs until Matt would respond and then the drunken audience member would keep the conversation rolling like it was a Q&A until he was booted.  The other two people who were kicked out were just being obnoxious.

I believe that the audience banter with musicians can partially be blamed on Lynyrd Skynyrd.  On their live album “One More from the Road” the band asks the audience “What song do you want to hear?” and the audience replies “Freebird!“.  This has lead to many drunken audiences screaming out “Freebird” at non-Lynyrd Skynyrd concerts.  It may have been funny the first few times but now it’s about as funny as “Git-R-Done“.  Because of this, Lynyrd Skynyrd has led to audiences thinking that they can and should be allowed to talk with musicians even when they aren’t asked to.

As a side story, a few years ago my friends and I would go to Boston Pizza to drink.  As we were drunken jackasses, we would go to the jukebox and choose songs that were long just to annoy people who were there.  The live version of “Freebird” and Led Zeppelin’s “Whole Lotta Love” and “Moby Dick” from How the West was Won were classics to choose.  After doing this a few times a waitress finally got so pissed off and that she just unplugped the jukebox.  We stopped doing this afterwards.


February 26, 2008


The 80th Academy Awards took place last Sunday (February 24th, 2008) and once again I did not watch them.  In all honesty, I can’t remember the last time I watched them.  Probably it was when I had my stupid little crush on Anna Paquin (like I wrote about here) so that was 10-11 years ago. 

It’s not that I don’t like movies as  I watch them quite often.  I’m not anti-Hollywood either and don’t only watch indie flicks like Gummo.  I just hate awards ceremonies.  The last awards ceremony I watched was probably the MTV Music Awards and I believe that it was 1993 as Aerosmith’s “Get a Grip” album was nominated for many awards.

For me, the Oscars are not about the films but for the people who were involved, mostly the actors and actresses, to show off how pretty they look.  It’s almost like graduating from High School:  Most people don’t give a shit about the hard work or cheating they did to graduate but rather about how pretty they look and how they are going to get shitfaced afterwards.

Also it might be because movies are so easy to watch before they even are released on DVD that part of the magic is gone. recently had an article about how “148 out of the 151 films selected for an Academy Award from 2003 to 2007 have cropped up online”.